2000 Mitisubishi Eclipse GT Want It All Motor

I got this new toy its a 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT and i want it to be a sleeper. All Motor I think NOS and Turbo are some **** ****. so let me know what needs to be done for this baby to be running the strip.


LOCK IT UP.IMMA HONDA KILLER>

quote:

ORIGINAL: 00ECLIPSEGTNY

I got this new toy its a 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT and i want it to be a sleeper. All Motor I think NOS and Turbo are some **** ****. so let me know what needs to be done for this baby to be running the strip.


LOCK IT UP.IMMA HONDA KILLER>

You are totally naive if you think that turbo's are for pussies. And just so you know your really gonna get flamed for that one. Maybe you should do some research and learn about them before you say dumbass crap like that. NO2 i kinda agree, i dont really like the idea of it, nor to i believe in using it, but turbcharging is incredibly efficient and not something that is for the beginner tuner. And if you think your gonna get alot out of that car without forced induction, or think you can do better without FI then your ignorant. The 6g72 is a great motor, just not something that youll benefit going all-motor with

good luck
if you want all motor go with a big block chevy

if you have an opinon like that, keep it to yourself.  you are in a forum full of ppl that have turbo's and you come in here w/ that kind of crappy attitude... just about any person in here w/ a turbo'd eclipse will walk ur car even when it's built. 

you will never get out of the 14s with an all motor 3G eclipse.   They make hardly any power on bolt ons..   youll ge to about 210WHP and thats about where it will end unless you got a HUGE banck accout and een still my little turbo motor will freaking make it look stupid

My GT is all motor and my TSi will slap it around like a red headed step child. ALL day... You might not wanna mention the turbo/**** thing again, guy. RCjr is right, 90% of us have forced induction cars, and last I checked most of them are running close to if not under 10s. Which, the GT and GTS are NOT really capable of sans a turbo or supercharger. It seems to me that you may just think this due to a lack of funding?

Actually, non FI in the GT motor of a 2000 is capable of pushing close *not as efficiently as a turbo* to the same power if compared to a small turbo. A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables. I have done research and debated both, the main reason I prefer turbo is you can get better gas mileage on your car if you want to by not using the boost but rather letting the TC condense your air and cool it off for ya while reusing any unburned fuel that is emitted as exhaust, and you can use a TC with Stock internals and push it's limits or Build the internals and crank up the PSI to exceed and pretty well double the stock Horse.

quote:

ORIGINAL: 00ECLIPSEGTNY

I got this new toy its a 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT and i want it to be a sleeper. All Motor I think NOS and Turbo are some **** ****. so let me know what needs to be done for this baby to be running the strip.


LOCK IT UP.IMMA HONDA KILLER>

 
You are the poster child for a generation raised on the ignorance of the fast & the furious.
May you find out the hard way... tht you are an idiot and an asshole.

Well im not even going to bother commenting on this one lol.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wingo171

Actually, non FI in the GT motor of a 2000 is capable of pushing close *not as efficiently as a turbo* to the same power if compared to a small turbo. A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables. I have done research and debated both, the main reason I prefer turbo is you can get better gas mileage on your car if you want to by not using the boost but rather letting the TC condense your air and cool it off for ya while reusing any unburned fuel that is emitted as exhaust, and you can use a TC with Stock internals and push it's limits or Build the internals and crank up the PSI to exceed and pretty well double the stock Horse.

All motor will never make the power of a turboing it.  even a T25 would put that car in the 250HP range and that thing is about as ****ty as it gets.  The 3G GT only makes about 150WHP and the 2000 model fed spec (which he has is only slightly better) and ask Russ (Tearstone) what happens to them when they go headers intake exhaust a tune and all that happy stuff.   Russ only made 180somthing WHP he gained like 20HP which is nothing the car was still a hih 14 sec car.   So now russ is running a 50trim turbo at 8 PSI and making well over 300HP and running low 13s.   you do the math lol..... Staying NA to try and make power is cool and all but he just def picked one of the worst platforms to even try to make power with.   At least hondas are light weight cars and they can make some power all motor with little money compaired to what it would take the 3G to make power at.

man even though i dont have a turbo yet i still know you wont get out of the 13-14 range without it i plan on puttin a 4g63t in mine but ya never mention the turbos are for pussies thing again it doesnt matter how mutch money you put into your car without a turbo even a fwd stock turbo will still beat you like a drum

quote:

ORIGINAL: EMonz57

you will never get out of the 14s with an all motor 3G eclipse.   They make hardly any power on bolt ons..   youll ge to about 210WHP and thats about where it will end unless you got a HUGE banck accout and een still my little turbo motor will freaking make it look stupid

 
mike he will get at most 215WHP =D its a 2000 fed spec haha =D and going all motor... go ahead... rebuild it be prepared to put down some money baby =D but sooner or later you'll want to go faster and slap a nice ole turbo on it..
 
your 2000 fed spec GT all motor
 
vs
 
my 2001 just a turbo no motor yet
 
you'll see the difference.. and you'll want some of this *pu$$y* $h|t tehe
 
not to flame but i am a big supporter with a turbo in our 3g's
 
 

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wingo171

Actually, non FI in the GT motor of a 2000 is capable of pushing close *not as efficiently as a turbo* to the same power if compared to a small turbo. A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables. I have done research and debated both, the main reason I prefer turbo is you can get better gas mileage on your car if you want to by not using the boost but rather letting the TC condense your air and cool it off for ya while reusing any unburned fuel that is emitted as exhaust, and you can use a TC with Stock internals and push it's limits or Build the internals and crank up the PSI to exceed and pretty well double the stock Horse.

 
here let me explain.. its KNOWN FACT that our GT pistons.. are a piece of crap... even pepboys pistons will work better for crying out loud... and dont get me started on the GTS pistons.. POS
 
you spend all that money on  A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables
 
you'll only get what max 275whp? with all that done.. i mean not bad.. but hey im running that on 7psi and 300whp at 8psi.. upgrade my pistons and your all motor wont be able to catch up.
 
build that motor.. slap on a turbo.. and insted of hondakiller you can be named vettekiller now which one sounds more beefy and bad.. oh man i beat a honda today... oh its so nice..
 
or dude i beat a vette =D
 
our cars are heavy... very heavy... and its basicly a tank ranging around 3000pounds well mine is 3227 pounds and with all motor you wont see or taste the 13s because the power in the motor wont get to it fast enough before the 1/4 is up.. get a built motor like i said slap on a turbo and some drag tires... tune it up good.. and your looking at what.. ive seen our 3g's hit mid 11's

quote:

ORIGINAL: 00ECLIPSEGTNY

I got this new toy its a 2000 Mitsubishi Eclipse GT and i want it to be a sleeper. All Motor I think NOS and Turbo are some **** ****. so let me know what needs to be done for this baby to be running the strip.


LOCK IT UP.IMMA HONDA KILLER>

 
must mean im a **** beacuse my 3g has one.. but my **** will slap you around all day long and im proud of it =D
 
sorry you just got me heated up... i didnt pay around 15k on all the mods and work i have done to it and for some kid to come in here and say its **** Sh*t 4k turbo 5k motor, 6k everything else.. not to mention i bought the car for 12k
 
dont take it personal.. im just ranting

watch this video.. and tell me if you change your mind or not =D
 
http://www.bebo.com/FlashBox.jsp?FlashViewType=TV&FlashBoxId=3744594486

IM a lil' under tha influence currently so I just wanna say......f*c* you!...thank you....gnite!

quote:

ORIGINAL: WPSpyderGT01

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wingo171

Actually, non FI in the GT motor of a 2000 is capable of pushing close *not as efficiently as a turbo* to the same power if compared to a small turbo. A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables. I have done research and debated both, the main reason I prefer turbo is you can get better gas mileage on your car if you want to by not using the boost but rather letting the TC condense your air and cool it off for ya while reusing any unburned fuel that is emitted as exhaust, and you can use a TC with Stock internals and push it's limits or Build the internals and crank up the PSI to exceed and pretty well double the stock Horse.

here let me explain.. its KNOWN FACT that our GT pistons.. are a piece of crap... even pepboys pistons will work better for crying out loud... and dont get me started on the GTS pistons.. POS

you spend all that money on  A lightened flywheel, performance clutch, cat back exhaust, CAI w/Performance intake manifold+TB, Headers, Fuel Injectors, Fuel Pump, Spark plugs+Spark Cables

you'll only get what max 275whp? with all that done.. i mean not bad.. but hey im running that on 7psi and 300whp at 8psi.. upgrade my pistons and your all motor wont be able to catch up.

build that motor.. slap on a turbo.. and insted of hondakiller you can be named vettekiller now which one sounds more beefy and bad.. oh man i beat a honda today... oh its so nice..

or dude i beat a vette =D

our cars are heavy... very heavy... and its basicly a tank ranging around 3000pounds well mine is 3227 pounds and with all motor you wont see or taste the 13s because the power in the motor wont get to it fast enough before the 1/4 is up.. get a built motor like i said slap on a turbo and some drag tires... tune it up good.. and your looking at what.. ive seen our 3g's hit mid 11's

dude your being generous... N\A he will never get 275WHP  it just will not happen,  the 3Gs are pigs  you and I both know that.  and they only show improvment on SDS or Turbo

I fully understand that our pistons are crap and blah blah blah, but I'm saying going NA is still possible to get some good power out of our motors. I'm not saying great power, but at least you can kill hondas, and for me that makes me happier than killing vettes because vettes are good cars and people can go ahead and praise vettes ,they're actually sporty cars, but hondas p!$$ me off because I live in ohio, about 30 minutes from a Honda plant, and all the little kids aroud here have a Honda and think they're something special and they praise their peices of s#!t.  As well as it's safer for the beginner tuners to go NA until they get some experience under their belt, they shouldn't be slappin a turbo in their car cause that's a quick way to blow a motor, especially in our 3G's.

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wingo171

I fully understand that our pistons are crap and blah blah blah, but I'm saying going NA is still possible to get some good power out of our motors. I'm not saying great power, but at least you can kill hondas, and for me that makes me happier than killing vettes because vettes are good cars and people can go ahead and praise vettes ,they're actually sporty cars, but hondas p!$$ me off because I live in ohio, about 30 minutes from a Honda plant, and all the little kids aroud here have a Honda and think they're something special and they praise their peices of s#!t.  As well as it's safer for the beginner tuners to go NA until they get some experience under their belt, they shouldn't be slappin a turbo in their car cause that's a quick way to blow a motor, especially in our 3G's.

While I totally agree with you on this.  Your only going to get around 220WHP N\A which will still get eaten up by quite a few NA hondas and acuras.  Eitehr way it will beat most hondas easily though.  And what is more impressive beating a civic or beating a vette.  I know id much rather be involed in racing a vette over a honda and much rather watch a race of a 3G beating a vette over a honda

Just a couple questions here, What is the difference between the Vin H and L on the GT engine? and What is the stock WHP of the GT?

Even a lot of the fastest muscle cars are putting turbo's on them...  Ive seen V12 vipers running twin turbo setups running over 1100 hp...  All motor is stupid when you have the resources to go with FI...    Who is the genius that gives you the idea that turbo's are for pussies?   Let me guess he has a v8 camaro or mutang that is running 13's...?

forget about mustang and forget about camaro, I'll take a Trans Am baby :D  (My mom used to own one before she had to trade it in due to it's exspensive water pump costs)

didnt think there was a differene with the H and L on the Vin area... all i know if you have a Fed itsa lil bit more powerful then the cali spec. by about 5 to 7 hp. on the GT

quote:

ORIGINAL: Wingo171

forget about mustang and forget about camaro, I'll take a Trans Am baby :D  (My mom used to own one before she had to trade it in due to it's exspensive water pump costs)

yea but Trans Am = camaro though.   they are the same car