RE: Lifted up? Or down low?

Mitsubishi Forum Classifieds Photo Gallery Timeslips Member List Search Sponsors Contact MF
Mitsubishi Lineup Mitsubishi News Recalls TSBs Timeslips Calendars Register Login

RE: Lifted up? Or down low?

Printable Version

Mitsubishi Forums >> General Mitsubishi Forums >> General Mitsubishi Chat >> RE: Lifted up? Or down low?

Page: << < prev 1 [2] 3 4 next > >>

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: Lifted up? Or down low? - 12/18/2006 12:59:53 PM

EMonz57

Posts: 11729
Joined: 5/13/2005
Status: offline

try here
http://www.mitsubishiforum.com/m_41486/tm.htm

_____________________________

1993 Supra 6spd(OOOO\ ..... /OOOO)

(in reply to cchrisj01)

Post #: 11

RE: Lifted up? Or down low? - 12/18/2006 3:29:15 PM

Mopar

Posts: 11
Joined: 11/22/2006
Status: offline

Thread title is misleading, I thought this was about a truck...

_____________________________

It's better to drive a slow car fast, than have to drive a fast car slow

(in reply to EMonz57)

Post #: 12

RE: Lifted up? Or down low? - 12/18/2006 8:49:00 PM

silvercoupe97

Posts: 3428
Joined: 11/10/2006
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: Mopar

Thread title is misleading, I thought this was about a truck...

Lol, that's what I thought too.

_____________________________

Thanks,
John

(in reply to Mopar)

Post #: 13

RE: Lifted up? Or down low? - 12/18/2006 9:03:41 PM

echostats

Posts: 178
Joined: 10/22/2006
Status: offline

I'm the lonely kid in the corner running 19s on a dsm like an idiot.

(in reply to silvercoupe97)

Post #: 14

RE: Lifted up? Or down low? - 12/18/2006 9:33:43 PM

EMonz57

Posts: 11729
Joined: 5/13/2005
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: echostats

I'm the lonely kid in the corner running 19s on a dsm like an idiot.

19s is to much for a non show car IMO. that is me. I wouldnt mind some nice 17s on the EVO. but no bigger than 18s for me

_____________________________

1993 Supra 6spd(OOOO\ ..... /OOOO)

(in reply to echostats)

Post #: 15

RE: Lifted up? Or down low? - 12/18/2006 9:44:22 PM

echostats

Posts: 178
Joined: 10/22/2006
Status: offline

Believe me dude, I am not going to the drag strip with these monsters. :) I plan to get a nice set of 17s and slam it once I get my Teins.

(in reply to EMonz57)

Post #: 16

RE: Lifted up? Or down low? - 12/19/2006 12:08:08 AM

cchrisj01

Posts: 79
Joined: 12/3/2006
Status: offline

cool, so the 17" with Low pro tires would drop it and make it look good right? the tire height from the rim to the top is the same size as your 2000 GS.

(in reply to echostats)

Post #: 17

RE: Lifted up? Or down low? - 12/19/2006 12:44:55 AM

Sebba

Posts: 14756
Joined: 2/20/2006
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline

What they are saying... is calculate the stock TOTAL diamiter of the rim+tire... from the top of the tire tot he ground.. and then calculate what it would be with your new rims and the tires... SIMPLE.

_____________________________

These cranks are made for walkin'''', and thats just what they''''ll do, one of these days these cranks are gonna walk all over you

(in reply to cchrisj01)

Post #: 18

RE: Lifted up? Or down low? - 12/19/2006 12:54:40 AM

davidmitsusrock

Posts: 3360
Joined: 4/13/2006
From: Boonville, MO
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EMonz57

here is my eclipse on 18x8s with 215\40

dude i never knew you were boosted on your old car....noice! what were your numbers?

_____________________________

2003 Mitsubishi Lancer ES

(in reply to EMonz57)

Post #: 19

RE: Lifted up? Or down low? - 12/19/2006 6:54:55 AM

EMonz57

Posts: 11729
Joined: 5/13/2005
Status: offline

It was never finished I started the install I peiced together the turbo kit. and I was the first person in the country to test fit the EVO VII\VIII turbo setup and make it fit. now there are 3 or 4 others who are running it using my method.

here are the pics and mods list. I sold the car cause it was a nightmare and a half it was broken litterally once a week if not more

http://www.mitsubishiforum.com/m_41486/tm.htm

_____________________________

1993 Supra 6spd(OOOO\ ..... /OOOO)

(in reply to davidmitsusrock)

Post #: 20