cold air intake vs. short ram intake

Printable Version

Mitsubishi >> Tech Help and Information >> Intake, Headers and Exhaust >> cold air intake vs. short ram intake

Page: [1]

Login Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>

cold air intake vs. short ram intake - 12/26/2006 10:38:07 PM    kniel023   Posts: 8 Joined: 12/26/2006 Status: offline i just recently got a 98 eclipse gs and it has a cold air intake...i've been reading in the forums and it seems like a short ram intake would be better...would it be beneficial if i put in a short ram intake and take out the cold air intake, or should i just not even bother? Post #: 1

RE: cold air intake vs. short ram intake - 12/27/2006 11:45:36 AM    davidmitsusrock Posts: 3360 Joined: 4/13/2006 From: Boonville, MO Status: offline a cold air intake is better on an NA car.  _____________________________ 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer ES (in reply to kniel023) Post #: 2

RE: cold air intake vs. short ram intake - 12/27/2006 10:26:31 PM    kniel023   Posts: 8 Joined: 12/26/2006 Status: offline stupid question  but wats an NA car (in reply to davidmitsusrock) Post #: 3

RE: cold air intake vs. short ram intake - 12/27/2006 10:51:19 PM    davidmitsusrock Posts: 3360 Joined: 4/13/2006 From: Boonville, MO Status: offline na-naturally aspirated....non turbo.  _____________________________ 2003 Mitsubishi Lancer ES (in reply to kniel023) Post #: 4

Today's Posts
Most Active Topics
Make A Donation
Forum Rules & FAQ
RSS Feeds

Mitsubishi Prices

Mitsubishi Vehicles
3000GT Lancer
Diamante Zinger
Eclipse Outlander
Endeavor Raider
Galant Lancer Evo

Top 10 Posters
sebba 14725 emonz57 11693 theengineer 10734 rcjr9186 5638 sanguinius 4762 dusty eclips 4387 jpmontero98 3425 silvercoupe9 3408 davidmitsusr 3360 dsm1990gsx 2954

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology