RE: Gauge Question
Login | |
|
RE: Gauge Question - 4/2/2007 4:37:19 AM
|
|
|
Kaede.Noir
Posts: 1825
Joined: 10/10/2006 Status: offline
|
well you know TECHNICALLY it isnt really ricey since both are stock bumpers... the thing is i've always fancied the viper and some dodge fron ends... dont get me wrong i LOVE the eclipse and way more stock, but my front bumper is crushed thnx to the old owner and i dunno why it came to mind that both cars being so similar might share the bumper with an easy convertion... so i was jw, and lemme say that that "Eclenger" as they call it there looks mad nice seriously... I'll try to look for it as well and see if i can find something similar the only thing is that it would miss the eclipse logo on the nose XD (which if you look closely seems like it has the same downwards angle as the eclipse stock bumper, not so sure bout the headlights though)
_____________________________
''98 2g 420a -Custom Aluminum radiator -Short ram shroom intake -No rice ''83 GTI 1.8 *SOLD* "the boat is gone, but now we got this huge gaping hole in the fence"
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: Gauge Question - 4/2/2007 5:10:28 AM
|
|
|
silvercoupe97
 Posts: 3408
Joined: 11/10/2006 Status: online
|
Ha, I beat you to it, lol Except for the LP, I think this actually looks better than the Eclipse front end on an Avenger/Sebring!
_____________________________
Thanks, John
|
|
|
|
RE: Gauge Question - 4/2/2007 5:21:27 AM
|
|
|
Kaede.Noir
Posts: 1825
Joined: 10/10/2006 Status: offline
|
Whoa it looks gorgeous!!!! and wtf with the taillights?!! i swear to god i was thinking about black tailights last nite (i hate altezza) i even photoshopped a pic of my babe... i wonder if thats tint or if its some kind of cover.... it really looks nice, and IMO it doesnt look ricey (but im sure someone is gonna flame it in less than 4 hours haha) Im not into the ricyness but im very custom about my stuff and i want something to stand out but isnt way out of the line (or includes bondo whatsofreakingever) And yes if theyre ever black the letters stay there
_____________________________
''98 2g 420a -Custom Aluminum radiator -Short ram shroom intake -No rice ''83 GTI 1.8 *SOLD* "the boat is gone, but now we got this huge gaping hole in the fence"
|
|
|
|
RE: Gauge Question - 4/2/2007 6:00:45 AM
|
|
|
silvercoupe97
 Posts: 3408
Joined: 11/10/2006 Status: online
|
To steer us back on topic (guilty)... You'll like those gauges GotBoost. I'm sure the Defi gauges are GREAT, but there's only a certain amount of $ to accuracy I'm willing to pay for. There are a lot of gauges that are accurate and I don't feel the need to link all of them together. If I hadn't been introduced to these, I would have gone with plain old VDO gauges, just to have the stock look...I'm not very flashy if you hadn't noticed, lol. I like the walk softly but carry a big stick, saying. Again, during the day they are still easy to see. I used to have AC Autotechnic's Invision S7s and they were hard to see during the day because they were lit with very weak lighting and glared with sunlight on them. Even with the sun on the Prosports, there's no glare, it actually helps since the light goes right through the smoked lenses. You won't regret getting them. Just make sure to post pics of them installed
< Message edited by silvercoupe97 -- 4/2/2007 6:04:54 AM >
_____________________________
Thanks, John
|
|
|
|
RE: Gauge Question - 4/2/2007 8:52:38 AM
|
|
|
EMonz57
 Posts: 11693
Joined: 5/13/2005 Status: online
|
prosports look good. they look like DEFI. DEFI's are not as good as every claim. The boost gauges are not accurate. they read 2-4 PSI higher than what really are running
_____________________________
1993 Supra 6spd(OOOO\ ..... /OOOO)
|
|
|
|
RE: Gauge Question - 4/2/2007 9:25:10 AM
|
|
|
silvercoupe97
 Posts: 3408
Joined: 11/10/2006 Status: online
|
I forgot to put a daytime pic of my buddy's car, so here it is. They match perfectly with STi too. I forgot to add, that they are much clearer than what you see here during the day. You'll be able to see the needles and numbers without worry.
< Message edited by silvercoupe97 -- 4/2/2007 9:26:23 AM >
_____________________________
Thanks, John
|
|
|
|
|