eclipse vs rsx (Full Version)

Mitsubishi >> General Mitsubishi Forums >> Sights N Sounds

eclipse vs rsx


  

dragonlancer -> eclipse vs rsx (6/4/2007 6:42:47 AM)

http://vids.myspace.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=vids.individual&videoid=2032682737


  

RCJr9186 -> RE: eclipse vs rsx (6/4/2007 7:44:57 AM)

boring, but nice kill


Dusty Eclipse -> RE: eclipse vs rsx (6/4/2007 7:47:21 AM)

Im with Ron... could have used a little more... anything...


dragonlancer -> RE: eclipse vs rsx (6/4/2007 7:55:32 AM)

was boring but still funny


Dusty Eclipse -> RE: eclipse vs rsx (6/4/2007 8:03:11 AM)

Odd that you dont really hear a turbo or anything... but Ill assume it was at least a GST


dragonlancer -> RE: eclipse vs rsx (6/4/2007 8:47:51 AM)

iono what it was randomly found it


50ul }{4ck3r -> RE: eclipse vs rsx (6/4/2007 4:37:18 PM)

lol...a rsx....lol a pinto can blow that out....lol i raced one full a chicks not compititon so good kill


year1lazer -> RE: eclipse vs rsx (6/5/2007 2:40:36 AM)

nice run


RCJr9186 -> RE: eclipse vs rsx (6/5/2007 5:24:54 AM)

quote:

ORIGINAL: 50ul }{4ck3r
lol...a rsx....lol a pinto can blow that out....lol i raced one full a chicks not compititon so good kill


not necessarily, the type S' come with the K24 which is rated at 210bhp.    among all motor cars, that a pretty quick car for stock.      it would have to be at least a gs-t if it were a type s.    but if it's a base model, a GS w/ a few mods could take it, but i doubt that quickly or brutally.


Dusty Eclipse -> RE: eclipse vs rsx (6/5/2007 5:39:02 AM)

Like I said b4, I dont hear a turbo there on the Eccy, and the RSX lacks the little half ass stock body kit to be the type-S. I could be wrong though...


  

Page: [1] 2   next >   >>

Return to Mitsubishi Forum home page or view the Full Version of this page.