Mitsubishi Forums Mitsubishi Forums    
   
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Timeslips   Member List   Search   Sponsors   Contact MF
  Mitsubishi Lineup   Mitsubishi News   Recalls   TSBs   Timeslips   Calendars   Register   Login  

AEM or K&N

  Printable Version
Mitsubishi Forum >> Tech Help and Information >> Intake, Headers and Exhaust >> AEM or K&N Page: [1] 2   next >   >>
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
AEM or K&N - 1/8/2008 6:16:05 AM   
Nemesis1982


Posts: 10
Joined: 12/31/2007
Status: offline
Nemesis1982's photo gallery
i wanna put an intake on my 2003 lancer i dunno what brand i should use...  i was thinking of going with K&N but your opinions would be apreciated :) thanks
Post #: 1
RE: AEM or K&N - 1/8/2008 7:09:46 AM   
TheEngineer



Posts: 10733
Joined: 1/25/2006
Status: offline
TheEngineer's photo gallery
both are just as good... K&N, AEM, Injen are all good brands and your not gonna see much of a difference performance wise between them

_____________________________



quote:

ORIGINAL: pilsenblue
Even tho My car looks great It will never be fast. Kinda like a hot girl that dosent give it up


(in reply to Nemesis1982)
Post #: 2
RE: AEM or K&N - 1/8/2008 10:33:12 AM   
kweef

 

Posts: 221
Joined: 12/18/2007
Status: offline
i personally like k & n


_____________________________


(in reply to Nemesis1982)
Post #: 3
RE: AEM or K&N - 1/8/2008 1:44:36 PM   
Rob



Posts: 875
Joined: 1/1/2008
From: mitsu-media.com
Status: online
Rob's photo gallery
Use the K&N filter, keep your stock pipe for now.

_____________________________

Rob/03 RR Lancer Evolution VIII

www.mitsu-media.com for your daily dose of Mitsubishi pictures and videos!


(in reply to kweef)
Post #: 4
RE: AEM or K&N - 1/8/2008 2:59:04 PM   
TheEngineer



Posts: 10733
Joined: 1/25/2006
Status: offline
TheEngineer's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rob

Use the K&N filter, keep your stock pipe for now.

why. The hard piping will look so much better and have alittle better flow. Sure the difference is almost negligable between the two, but the intake pipe looks alot better.

_____________________________



quote:

ORIGINAL: pilsenblue
Even tho My car looks great It will never be fast. Kinda like a hot girl that dosent give it up


(in reply to Rob)
Post #: 5
RE: AEM or K&N - 1/8/2008 3:09:22 PM   
Sebba


Posts: 14725
Joined: 2/20/2006
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
Sebba's photo gallery
Agreed ^^

_____________________________


These cranks are made for walkin'''', and thats just what they''''ll do, one of these days these cranks are gonna walk all over you

(in reply to TheEngineer)
Post #: 6
RE: AEM or K&N - 1/8/2008 3:36:36 PM   
Rob



Posts: 875
Joined: 1/1/2008
From: mitsu-media.com
Status: online
Rob's photo gallery
Oh, you guys believe in form over function? I was there once. No i'm a budget tuner now. A $200 pipe for .5 bhp. I'll go with just a filter thanks.

_____________________________

Rob/03 RR Lancer Evolution VIII

www.mitsu-media.com for your daily dose of Mitsubishi pictures and videos!


(in reply to Sebba)
Post #: 7
RE: AEM or K&N - 1/8/2008 4:32:15 PM   
TheEngineer



Posts: 10733
Joined: 1/25/2006
Status: offline
TheEngineer's photo gallery
Look with your evo i agree because it is actually bad to change out the stock piping, however on something like lancer the pipe is not gonna cost 200 and its not like the lancer already has a bunch of nice stuff to make the engine bay look good. Its up to the buyer what they like, and i agree with you about the price though because all i have in my mr2 is a filter. But when it comes to a NA car, its nice to have a CAI

_____________________________



quote:

ORIGINAL: pilsenblue
Even tho My car looks great It will never be fast. Kinda like a hot girl that dosent give it up


(in reply to Rob)
Post #: 8
RE: AEM or K&N - 1/8/2008 4:37:37 PM   
EMonz57



Posts: 11692
Joined: 5/13/2005
Status: online
EMonz57's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Rob

Oh, you guys believe in form over function? I was there once. No i'm a budget tuner now. A $200 pipe for .5 bhp. I'll go with just a filter thanks.
That is understandable.   However you can just as easily pay like $25 and make your own intake and use a nice filter.  Form with the same function and also on a buget.   If your talented enough and take your time youll make something look real

My old turbo but a home made intake pipe with recirc and all.  and guess what it is still on the car with the 50trim turbo too lol (It is not going to stay blue though)









_____________________________

1993 Supra 6spd(OOOO\ ..... /OOOO)

(in reply to Rob)
Post #: 9
RE: AEM or K&N - 1/8/2008 4:42:26 PM   
Rob



Posts: 875
Joined: 1/1/2008
From: mitsu-media.com
Status: online
Rob's photo gallery
Clearly your opinion and i respect that.
You wouldn't believe how many people have thanked me for saving them major cash when it comes to the intake mod.
I bet no one here would be able to tell the difference in power between the 2 same exact cars, one with a cai, and one with stock piping and open filter.

_____________________________

Rob/03 RR Lancer Evolution VIII

www.mitsu-media.com for your daily dose of Mitsubishi pictures and videos!


(in reply to TheEngineer)
Post #: 10
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1] 2   next >   >>

 
Mitsubishi >> Tech Help and Information >> Intake, Headers and Exhaust
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
sebba14725
emonz5711692
theengineer10733
rcjr91865638
sanguinius4762
dusty eclips4387
jpmontero983425
silvercoupe93408
davidmitsusr3360
dsm1990gsx2954

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology

Mitsubishi Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.