EVO OR STI
Login  | |
|
EVO OR STI - 1/31/2008 8:51:16 PM
|
|
|
aloyboy86
Posts: 3
Joined: 1/31/2008
Status: offline
|
hi thinking of getting either an EVO X or a 08STI....
anyone can tell me the diff between the 2?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: EVO OR STI - 2/1/2008 8:22:09 AM
|
|
|
RCJr9186
Posts: 5635
Joined: 7/27/2005
From: Summerville, SC
Status: offline
|
yea. different letters. no but for real. i haven't even seen a new STI that isn't a wagon... i don't like the new look of either car but think that Mitsu did a much better job of keeping it sporty. EVO X w/ it's AYC. DEFINATLY!!!!
and seriously... what did you think we'd say? this is www.MITSUBISHIforum.com
_____________________________
quote:
Sebba
Use.... the.... FU CKING SEARCH BUTTON.
|
|
|
|
|
RE: EVO OR STI - 2/1/2008 9:43:49 AM
|
|
|
Sebba
Posts: 14721
Joined: 2/20/2006
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: offline
|
Okay. Im going to quote Car&Driver and Road&Track.
Out of the VW Golf R32, EVO X, and STi, the STi came last, and the EVO came first. Why?
STi:
Highs: Fantastic high-end grunt, supple ride, an interior worth of the sticker price.
Lows: Vague, overly assisted steering; flaccid power below 4000 rpm; a chassis set to terminal understeer.
EVO X:
Highs: Yaw control that abolishes understeer, awesome grip, great low-end torque for a turbo.
Lows: Needs a telescoping steering wheel, one more gear, and an interior worth the price.
This is a direct quote from Car&Driver. (I couldnt find the road and track one) lol.
I would 100% agree with what is written here. I would have also added that the STi is incredibly ugly for one, and if you ever decide to modd the hell out of the car, the EVO can handle a crap load more power on the stock internals than the STi. The reason being, its horizontally opposed motor.
_____________________________
 These cranks are made for walkin'''', and thats just what they''''ll do, one of these days these cranks are gonna walk all over you |
|
|
|
|
Printable Version
