Mitsubishi Forums Mitsubishi Forums    
   
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Timeslips   Member List   Search   Sponsors   Contact MF
  Mitsubishi Lineup   Mitsubishi News   Recalls   TSBs   Timeslips   Calendars   Register   Login  

RE: Jetta

  Printable Version
Mitsubishi Forums >> General Mitsubishi Forums >> Off Topic >> RE: Jetta Page: <<   < prev  1 [2]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
RE: Jetta - 5/8/2008 10:11:13 AM   
Nakura17


Posts: 91
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
I know someone who's had a turbo VW for a whil enow and hasn't any problems with it. He has a few mods on it, not sure as to how deep he went with messing with the engine but I haven't heard any complaints or problems from him.

(in reply to Rob)
Post #: 11
RE: Jetta - 5/8/2008 10:21:46 AM   
Jarreddl


Posts: 96
Joined: 1/6/2008
Status: offline
well i just want turbo and im fine lol. 

(in reply to Nakura17)
Post #: 12
RE: Jetta - 5/8/2008 11:08:05 AM   
estraw


Posts: 2156
Joined: 12/10/2005
Status: offline
estraw's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: tidus10

is he running aftermarket stuff? cause from my expierences vdubs are very reliable stock cars...


the only jetta's ive heard of being reliable are the 2.0's, and they are slow lol, dont expect too much performance from them unless you are gonna go drastic (as in boosting it) and then it will most likely loose its reliability


_____________________________


(in reply to tidus10)
Post #: 13
RE: Jetta - 5/8/2008 11:25:32 AM   
dorian7


Posts: 695
Joined: 6/16/2007
Status: offline
dorian7's photo gallery
Yeah I don't know who got the idea that they are reliable. I had a friend with a 95 2.0 and his broke down almost every 3 months. One time he was having electrical issues and smoke came out of the instrument cluster. The turbos and V6's are especially unreliable. They are one of the most unreliable cars of all time. Just look at consumer report

http://www.consumerreports.org/cro/cars/used-cars/cr-recommended/the-best-worst-used-cars-406/overview/index.htm?resultPageIndex=1&resultIndex=6&searchTerm=least%20reliable%20cars%201998

If you look at other reports too it is almost always on the most unreliable list. Combined with really expensive parts, I would not reccomend it.




_____________________________


(in reply to Rob)
Post #: 14
RE: Jetta - 5/8/2008 11:47:01 AM   
Nakura17


Posts: 91
Joined: 5/2/2008
Status: offline
Haha didn't think they'd be that bad - Stay away from mods then if your going to go with it, just increases the risk/chance

(in reply to Nakura17)
Post #: 15
RE: Jetta - 5/8/2008 1:37:21 PM   
jpmontero98


Posts: 3258
Joined: 2/7/2007
From: when a man and women fall in love, the man........
Status: online
jpmontero98's photo gallery
a 2.slow is a mad reliable car, VR6s are the faster ones

_____________________________

1999 Nissan Altima GXE KA24DE,

Mods: NOTHIN TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG!
My list of **** to do

(in reply to Nakura17)
Post #: 16
RE: Jetta - 5/8/2008 1:53:29 PM   
Jarreddl


Posts: 96
Joined: 1/6/2008
Status: offline
well i think if i get one it will be the vr6 and it will be awhile from now but its just a thought.

are any of the jetta engines as fast as the 420a at least?

(in reply to jpmontero98)
Post #: 17
RE: Jetta - 5/8/2008 2:53:53 PM   
jpmontero98


Posts: 3258
Joined: 2/7/2007
From: when a man and women fall in love, the man........
Status: online
jpmontero98's photo gallery
the VR6 is MAD fats, you kidding? those have a massive amount of potential, theyre a pretty popular car to modify

_____________________________

1999 Nissan Altima GXE KA24DE,

Mods: NOTHIN TO SEE HERE MOVE ALONG!
My list of **** to do

(in reply to Jarreddl)
Post #: 18
RE: Jetta - 5/8/2008 3:11:33 PM   
estraw


Posts: 2156
Joined: 12/10/2005
Status: offline
estraw's photo gallery
quote:

ORIGINAL: Jarreddl

well i think if i get one it will be the vr6 and it will be awhile from now but its just a thought.

are any of the jetta engines as fast as the 420a at least?



whats your definition of 'fast'? yes, the 2.0's are probably a little faster because they are lighter then the eclipse. if the 420a defines your standard of fast, you got some issues to sort out


_____________________________


(in reply to Jarreddl)
Post #: 19
RE: Jetta - 5/9/2008 11:02:33 PM   
Jarreddl


Posts: 96
Joined: 1/6/2008
Status: offline
no no no i dont think the 420a is fast. if a jetta is slower than this then there is no way i am getting one haha. im never getting a car slower than this haha.

This is my first car so i havent even expierenced fast yet and i want to and i know i prolly wont if i get a jetta but i like them.  Plus i see alot more jettas and golfs around than dsms, so they would be easier to get ahold of.

but dont think im getting rid of my dsm cuz im in love even if it is just a 420a haha

(in reply to estraw)
Post #: 20
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   <<   < prev  1 [2]

 
Mitsubishi >> General Mitsubishi Forums >> Off Topic
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Ride of the Month
May 2008
2003 Evolution

Top 10 Posters
sebba13345
emonz5710955
theengineer10172
rcjr91865627
sanguinius4731
dusty eclips4353
davidmitsusr3342
jpmontero983258
silvercoupe92883
tidus102730

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
K&N Engineering, Inc.

Mitsubishi Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.