RE: A 4g63 Civic

Mitsubishi Forum Classifieds Photo Gallery Timeslips Member List Search Sponsors Contact MF
Mitsubishi Lineup Mitsubishi News Recalls TSBs Timeslips Calendars Register Login

RE: A 4g63 Civic

Printable Version

Mitsubishi >> General Mitsubishi Forums >> Sights N Sounds >> RE: A 4g63 Civic

Page: << < prev 1 2 [3]

Message

<< Older Topic Newer Topic >>

RE: A 4g63 Civic - 6/5/2008 11:41:22 PM

silvercoupe97

Posts: 3129
Joined: 11/10/2006
Status: online

quote:

ORIGINAL: Sebba

Of course not a bolt in swap, but&\\;nbsp\\;I highly doubt he had a shop do it.

quote:

ORIGINAL: EMonz57

It was a shop that did it. \\; I think he owns the shop or something. \\; It does say some shop name on there.

What''s up with all the crazy characters in y''''alls posts?

< Message edited by silvercoupe97 -- 6/5/2008 11:49:32 PM >

_____________________________

Thanks,
John
6 bolt/2g head,1G rods/2G pistons,FPBig28,MBC,Forge 1G DV,alky inj,AFPR,255lph,780cc, 3" turboback,Centerforce,4 spider,FMIC, Prosport Boost&EGT gauges,AEM wideband,DSMlink, AGX/Skunk2

(in reply to EMonz57)

Post #: 21

RE: A 4g63 Civic - 6/10/2008 6:05:24 PM

estraw

Posts: 2200
Joined: 12/10/2005
Status: offline

normally id agree with mike on this kinda thing, but i gotta go with sebba here. that thing is a sleeper and a half. i would definately drive one of those especially if it had a 4g swap. i think it needs to be a built motor runnin like 30 psi, but its still a good idea imo

< Message edited by estraw -- 6/10/2008 6:14:11 PM >

_____________________________

(in reply to silvercoupe97)

Post #: 22

RE: A 4g63 Civic - 6/10/2008 6:39:01 PM

Sebba

Posts: 14323
Joined: 2/20/2006
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: online

Thanks!

_____________________________

These cranks are made for walkin'', and thats just what they''ll do, one of these days these cranks are gonna walk all over you

(in reply to estraw)

Post #: 23

RE: A 4g63 Civic - 6/15/2008 3:59:15 PM

victim619

Posts: 303
Joined: 4/19/2007
Status: offline

i just hate CRX''s just opinion. it is fast, but id never drive it. one of the fastest cars out here is a GT500 and theres a CRX that kept up with it better then most cars out here but its because it was all stripped. just had half a dash and a seat with carbon fiber almost everything. damn thing probably weighs 1000lbs haha with a lot of engine mods with a turbo, and the gt500 had a couple bolt ons and a tune.

(in reply to Sebba)

Post #: 24

RE: A 4g63 Civic - 6/20/2008 6:40:06 AM

Lil Evo

Posts: 677
Joined: 7/13/2006
Status: offline

I honestly expected a little better out of a CRX with a g63 swap. And I agree with the motor mod vs. N2O thing, you''ll get more reliable power out of quality modifications than you will out of a shot of nitrous. And what moron goes through the trouble of frankeinsteining a Mitsubishi motor into a roached out Honda, then throws a 120 shot on it when the motor is bone stock? Sounds like someone needs to put down the F&F movies and do some thinking on their own. On the whole, quick car, resepectable times, but not my cup o tea.

_____________________________

(in reply to victim619)

Post #: 25

RE: A 4g63 Civic - 6/26/2008 1:05:34 PM

plethoric33

Posts: 16
Joined: 6/26/2008
Status: offline

Sebba''s right....no need to hate on a fast car just because its a honda. I had a Civic hatch that was pretty quick and thats why I drove it, got offered an Eclipse so I traded for it. Hating it because its a Honda is like muscle guys hating Mits because its not a Ford or Chev....which is gay.

(in reply to Lil Evo)

Post #: 26

RE: A 4g63 Civic - 6/26/2008 1:06:53 PM

Sebba

Posts: 14323
Joined: 2/20/2006
From: San Antonio, TX
Status: online

^^ And thats how I see it.

_____________________________

These cranks are made for walkin'', and thats just what they''ll do, one of these days these cranks are gonna walk all over you

(in reply to plethoric33)

Post #: 27

RE: A 4g63 Civic - 6/26/2008 3:37:59 PM

EMonz57

Posts: 11346
Joined: 5/13/2005
Status: offline

I was not hating on it being a honda. I was hating on the stupid fact that a crx can run just as fast or faster than this car did without spending the $$$$ to swap a mitsu motor in. I have seen crxs in person running low 11s at the track. they had no mitsu motor in them lol. that is ok to me (not my choice as they are ugly as ****) but putting a mitsu motor in is a joke. and the car is no sleeper. I dont get how anyone would say that. its like saying hey that Evo has a black pained FMIC that car is a sleeper lol

_____________________________

1993 Renn Red Supra Turbo 6spd

(in reply to Sebba)

Post #: 28

RE: A 4g63 Civic - 6/26/2008 9:02:04 PM

plethoric33

Posts: 16
Joined: 6/26/2008
Status: offline

quote:

ORIGINAL: EMonz57

I was not hating on it being a honda. I was hating on the stupid fact that a crx can run just as fast or faster than this car did without spending the $$$$ to swap a mitsu motor in. I have seen crxs in person running low 11s at the track. they had no mitsu motor in them lol. that is ok to me (not my choice as they are ugly as ****) but putting a mitsu motor in is a joke. and the car is no sleeper. I dont get how anyone would say that. its like saying hey that Evo has a black pained FMIC that car is a sleeper lol

I agree there...Ive seen Crx''s with a $800 B18 swap run low 11s...theres a youtube vid of a lambo being beat by a B18 crx twice. The mits crx was more showing "I have money and can do this" I think. lol

(in reply to EMonz57)

Post #: 29