sohc vs dohc
Login | |
|
sohc vs dohc - 7/29/2008 6:34:28 AM
|
|
|
BrianWSNC
Posts: 35
Joined: 7/28/2008 Status: offline
|
I am looking to buy a 3000GT. I found what I want, Red, Automatic,SL, leather seats, low miles, good price. Then I found out the engine was a Single Overhead Cam design. I know it''s lower in Horse Power, but is it that bad? My first choice was 1994~1996 (second Generation) My second choice is Third Generation 1997~1999. Can I get some advise from the pros here...:)
|
|
|
|
|
|
RE: sohc vs dohc - 7/30/2008 3:22:54 AM
|
|
|
isiah
Posts: 96
Joined: 11/13/2006 Status: offline
|
haha, yes... it IS that bad.lol what do you want out of the car? and why not go for a manual? do you plan on modifying it AT all.? ? if so, you may want to reconsider and go manual instead of auto. and auto SOHC is REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY REALLY THAT bad.lol _isiah
|
|
|
|
RE: sohc vs dohc - 7/30/2008 5:17:00 AM
|
|
|
BrianWSNC
Posts: 35
Joined: 7/28/2008 Status: offline
|
Thanks for the insite and reply.... I really really really apprecate it! I am not sure if I will do any mods to it, but we will see... ( I normally do mod my cars, trucks and ATVs''). Automatic because I had a hip replacement 10 years ago and pushing a clutch causes pain after awhile. Other than that I might opt for a manual trans. Again, thanks for your insite. I will continue to look till I find the one that fits.
|
|
|
|
Contact Us |
Sitemap |
Link To Us |
Advertising |
Automotive Links |
Mitsubishi Links |
Archive |
About Us |
Legal |
Privacy Policy |
© Mitsubishi Forum
Mitsubishi Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.
|