Mitsubishi Forums Mitsubishi Forums    
   
Mitsubishi
Mitsubishi Forum   Classifieds   Photo Gallery   Timeslips   Member List   Search   Sponsors   Contact MF
  Mitsubishi Lineup   Mitsubishi News   Recalls   TSBs   Timeslips   Calendars   Register   Login  

4g63t vs. 4g64t

  Printable Version
Mitsubishi Forum >> Mitsubishi Models >> Mitsubishi Galant >> 4g63t vs. 4g64t Page: [1]
Login
Message << Older Topic   Newer Topic >>
4g63t vs. 4g64t - 3/19/2006 3:18:15 PM   
jonzie04

 

Posts: 4
Joined: 3/17/2006
Status: offline
Hey im new to mitsubishis...im a big nissan guy however i just purchased a 98 galant es...what are some advantages or disadvantages to both the engines? Which do you think could get me to about 250 hp? which would be cheaper to build? If possible i'd like to keep my 64 sice its 2.4 liters instead of 2.0.
Post #: 1
RE: 4g63t vs. 4g64t - 3/19/2006 8:36:29 PM   
Sanguinius


Ownz ALL threads
Posts: 4757
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
Sanguinius's photo gallery
The 4g63 is the most widely supported platform. There are a few 4g63's out there witht eh 64's head on them. It all depends what you're willing to spend and how patient you are. You can get the 250 ponies outta the 64 it just costs a bit more.

_____________________________



(in reply to jonzie04)
Post #: 2
RE: 4g63t vs. 4g64t - 3/19/2006 8:37:28 PM   
Sanguinius


Ownz ALL threads
Posts: 4757
Joined: 3/27/2005
Status: offline
Sanguinius's photo gallery
Oh and BTW Welcome I'm a converted Nissan man as well. I have an '03 Sentra daily driver and a '92 Eclipse project as well as a '88 Conquest project.

_____________________________



(in reply to jonzie04)
Post #: 3
RE: 4g63t vs. 4g64t - 4/13/2006 7:56:50 PM   
davidmitsusrock


Posts: 3360
Joined: 4/13/2006
From: Boonville, MO
Status: offline
i would say the 4g63 is way better for high horsepower then the 4g64, my borther has a 4g64 3rd gen eclipse and it dynoed 108whp with a injen cold air intake...

< Message edited by davidmitsusrock -- 4/13/2006 7:57:05 PM >

(in reply to Sanguinius)
Post #: 4
RE: 4g63t vs. 4g64t - 4/14/2006 12:24:04 AM   
tidus10


Posts: 2767
Joined: 11/15/2005
Status: offline
tidus10's photo gallery
i am a nissan guy and a mitsu buy..lo i got a 78 datsun 280Z and a 96 mitsu eclipse syder GS (4g64) andfrom my expierences the 64 it torquier...its harder to find thing for but i personally think that a 64 has more long term potencial..but the 63 is a general platform like sang said so its easier to get up there cause its easier to find the right things....thats also why there is the price difference in supplies in the two motors....

_____________________________

quote:

ORIGINAL: Joshewuhh
No doubt about it, this topic is gone.
Sebba killed it with the horse c**k.


(in reply to davidmitsusrock)
Post #: 5
RE: 4g63t vs. 4g64t - 4/14/2006 7:37:32 AM   
EMonz57



Posts: 11374
Joined: 5/13/2005
Status: offline
EMonz57's photo gallery
the 4g64 is fine more tq faster spool and can handle 15PSI on stock bottom end which will get around 310WHP. the 4g63 cant really be swapped unless its an EVO motor in which case is crazy retardedly expensive anyways

_____________________________

1993 Renn Red Supra Turbo 6spd

(in reply to tidus10)
Post #: 6
RE: 4g63t vs. 4g64t - 5/19/2006 2:08:39 AM   
Prophet


Posts: 600
Joined: 10/29/2003
From: United States
Status: offline
Prophet's photo gallery
You can swap in a 4G63t from a 1G or 2G Eclipse into a 7G Galant. Has been done plenty of times. I would actually suggest a 4G64 block with a 4G63t head for the best motor to build on.

(in reply to EMonz57)
Post #: 7
Login OR Register now to post a reply to this forum topic.
Page:   [1]

 
Mitsubishi >> Mitsubishi Models >> Mitsubishi Galant
Jump to:



Featured Sponsors
Advertising Info

Top 10 Posters
sebba14391
emonz5711374
theengineer10431
rcjr91865632
sanguinius4757
dusty eclips4368
davidmitsusr3360
jpmontero983329
silvercoupe93139
tidus102767

New Vendors
AMSOIL - Performance Oil Technology
K&N Engineering, Inc.

Mitsubishi Forum .com is not affiliated with or endorsed by Mitsubishi Motors.